Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
The cost of plastic packaging[2016/10/18]
-
2016years UL94v-0 flame rate test report[2016/09/11]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
On the sleepy Hawaiian island of Kauai sits a first of its kind solar and battery project.[2016/11/18]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]