Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Nexar's new app uses vehicle network and AI to avoid accidents[2016/11/17]
-
2016years UL94v-0 flame rate test report[2016/09/11]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]