Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South Africa[2016/10/22]
-
Compounder Adell Plastics shifts work to other plants following Baltimore fire[2016/10/10]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]