Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Lyon Solar, Mitsubishi in 1000MW solar battery plunge[2016/09/30]
-
Compounder Adell Plastics shifts work to other plants following Baltimore fire[2016/10/10]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Henrik Fisker is using a revolutionary new battery to power his Tesla killer[2016/10/17]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]